It would be a waste of public fund to go to London for one week to do research and study references related to rights of Sabah under the Malaysia Agreement 1963(MA63). One week is too short to do any good research because we know the documents are voluminous.
柔佛苏丹DYMM，苏丹易卜拉欣伊布尼阿尔马胡姆苏丹依斯干达今天呼吁联邦政府给予柔佛州更公平和更好的发展，以免柔佛被迫脱离联邦。给予平等对待而不是被视为不受欢迎的“继子”的“请求”一直是砂拉越和沙巴的斗争，反对联邦在我们生活的各个方面给予我们非常不平等的待遇。
The premier, Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg needs to be advised that there is no provision in the federal and Sarawak constitution to prohibit Sarawak to leave the federation of Malaysia, if Sarawak decides to do so. At the same time, the premier is not empowered by the Sarawak constitution to decide for the fate of Sarawak and Sarawakians whether or not Sarawak should remain in the federation of Malaysia forever.
Perasmian RUMAH ADAT LANG NGIDANG Anjuran Serakup Bala Dayak Borneo ( S. B. D. B) Di Kampong Perian, Lundu Telah dirasmikan oleh Tuan Ryan Sim Min Leong, Bakal Calon Parti Bumi Kenyalang P192 Mas Gading pada tarikh 21 May 2022
The newly formed action group JUSTICE FOR SABAH (JFS) by a group of passionate Sabah leaders to champion the rights and justice for all Sabahan and Sarawakian had on the 28th April 2022 executed a Memorandum of Association (MOA) with a Kuala Lumpur based established professional firm MYKITA Sdn. Bhd. (myKITA), whose business is the Centre of Integrity, Professional governance and Advance. They provide also a wide range of educational training and consultation with a strong team of learned professional expertise.
(Borneo Post - OCTOBER 31, 2015, SATURDAY AT 12:01 AM)
KUCHING: The High Court here yesterday overturned the home ministry’s decision to ban the Sarawak Association of Peoples’ Aspiration (Sapa) made on Nov 14 last year.
A person who claimed himself as a senior police officer from Bukit Aman in past two weeks phoned to my office and to me a few times, wanted a statement to be taken concerning a statement to the press I made on 18th March, 2022 concerning rights of citizens to sue the government for any unhappiness in connection with Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
Sarawak is given 31 out of 222 seats in parliament, while Sabah is given 25 seats only. This is how Malaya controls Sarawak and Sabah economically and politically. By taking most seats in parliament, it is difficult for Sarawakians and Sabahans to agree that Sarawak and Sabah are not colonies of Malaya when Malaya controls Parliament.
Just now a person who claimed himself as a very senior police from Malaysian Police Headquarters, Bukit Aman, who could only speak malay, but found difficulties in speaking in English, phoned to me when I was on my way back from court, wanting to investigate concerning the Malaysia Agreement Suit filed by 11 plaintiffs in November 2021 in Kuching High Court.
The Petroleum Development Act 1974 is in breach of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and the federal constitution. It is therefore, null and void, but, so far had not been repealed. The GPS government knows this but what had the GPS government done until today?
The government should make a careful study before implementing the minimum wage of RM1,500-00 come this 1st May, 2022. Most people are in the employment sector and they would, no doubt, be very happy with the implementation of this minimum wage policy.
The government should not deny that there are side effects caused by vaccinations. There are many people who were healthy but, mysteriously paralyzed or died after vaccinations. There are reports and talks claiming that the vaccines are not safe. The effectiveness of the vaccines to combat Covid-19 also raised doubts among many members of public.
After the suit filed against the United Kingdom, Malaysia and Sarawak governments as Defendants, seeking the court to determine the legality of the formation of Malaysia, I received many queries from members of the public about the Suit. This was the first suit of its kind seeking the court to declare Malaysia Agreement 1963 as an invalid international agreement.
（FMT V Anbalagan -2022 年 3 月 15 日晚上 7:22 报导） 11名砂拉越人声称，1963年马来西亚协议从一开始就无效。PUTRAJAYA 15日讯息：11名砂拉越人已向古晋高等法院提起诉讼，要求将砂拉越领土从马来西亚联邦中移除。
如果没有英国和马来亚与新加坡、沙巴和砂拉越签订 1963 年马来西亚协议，马来西亚就无法在 1963 年成立。在马来西亚联邦数十年后，许多砂拉越人意识到与马来亚联合组建马来西亚并没有帮助大多数砂拉越人提升他们的生活水平。
After the suit filed against the United Kingdom, Malaysia and Sarawak governments as Defendants, seeking the court to determine the legality of the formation of Malaysia, I received many queries from members of the public about the Suit. This was the first suit of its kind seeking the court to declare Malaysia Agreement 1963 as an invalid international agreement.
On March 14, 2022, a youth fell into a drain in MJC Batu Kawah New Towship. He got out of his parked car and was supposed to walk up to his shophouse apartment. He stepped on the cement drain cover and it broke. This incident happened right infront of me. He was groaning in pain. He suffered severe scratches and bruises on his right leg.
Building schools for Sarawak is the responsibility of the federal government and there is no need for the Sarawak government to surrender or transfer any land for the purpose of school buildings to the Federal Land Commissioner. The Sarawak government needs only tell the federal government to build them.
The world had been battling against covid-19 and many had suffered. Now with the war between Ukraine and Russia which erupted a few days ago and there is a fear that this war can lead to 3rd World War, but, it should be foreseeable that the war will have impact on the economy the whole world.
The Sarawak Advocates Ordinance needs to be amended to protect the interest of Sarawak under the federal constitution and the Malaysia Agreement 1963 which prohibit non Sarawakians to practise law in Sarawak if they have no Sarawak connection or if they failed to comply with the necessary requirement of the law.
I sought to intervene the admission of two retired federal court Judges, YAA Tan Sri Richard Malanjum and YAA Tan Sri David Wong to practice as resident lawyers in Sarawak.
Citizens of Sarawak and Sabah should not be happy with the gazette of Constitution (Amendment) Act 2022, concerning Clause 2 of Article 1; the definition of the Federation and the new definition of Malaysia Day in Clause 2 of Article 160; the indigenous races of Sarawak in Clause (6)(a) of Article 161A; and the removal of Clause 7 of Article 161A.