Welcome To Voice Of Kenyalang 肯雅兰之声,欢迎您！
肯雅兰之声是由一群关心砂拉越的未来发展的砂拉越人发起，目的是尽量为砂拉越人民提供即时的有关砂拉越的发展消息，一起从古至今了解砂拉越事实情况并探讨砂拉越未来的路何去何从。 砂拉越和沙巴人民最关心的是建立马来西亚的国际公约，就是马来西亚公约1963 (MA63)。这公约说明了马来西亚是由三邦成立，三邦就是砂拉越，沙巴和马来亚。没有砂拉越和沙巴就没有马来西亚。没有“马来西亚公约1963”也就没有马来西亚。
所以“马来西亚公约1963”是不可被修改不可以被取消。没有得到砂拉越政府和人民同意之下不可以以其他方法修改马来西亚的宪法和通过新法令来限制“马来西亚公约1963”权利，危害砂拉越和沙巴的主权和利益。现今情况明显抵触了“马来西亚公约1963”，也动摇了马来西亚建国基础。
This website is established by a group of concern Sarawakian with the aim to provide latest news of Sarawak. Learning from the past and charting new path for the future. Sabah and Sarawak people main concern is the restoration of Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) which had been properly registered at United Nation (UN), and MA63 is the foundation of formation of Malaysia. During formation of Malaysia, Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya are equal partners therefore any ACTS, laws, regulation and policies passed in parliament (with the intention to restrict or nullify full function of Malaysia Agreement 1963) are illegal and therefore are against the very foundation of formation of Malaysia at the disadvantage of Sarawak and Sabah with the intention to remove equal partners status of Sarawak and Sabah making Sabah and Sarawak one of the states in Malaysia.
Featured News 特色文章
The truth at last?
Audrian Len Facebook Article Shared:
The 1MDB RM2.6Billion case probably has annoyed Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia may have been seen as an "accomplice" in the 1MDB case.
在议会发表的都是废话？
哎呀，55年前眼前的GPS(同样的也包括PH)议员一些还没有出世，另一些还抱着奶瓶如何反对？当时砂拉越的少数的砂拉越国会议员反对有用吗？反对了能够平安回砂拉越吗？ 会不会也像沙巴一样整飞机的议员被炸死？如果各个政党的以往所做所为，就可以拿来批判今天各个政党的无辜的年轻领袖，那么行动党曾经和伊党(回教党)合作过，砂拉越的行动党还允许那么大小声指责其他党的领袖和对他们发难？
婆罗洲佳燕皇朝五世国王立位典礼在香港举行
山打根人應知的史實
【婆罗洲佳燕皇朝五世国王立位典礼在香港举行】
婆羅洲處於東南亞中心地帶，四面環海，海岸線長達1440公里，其中蘇祿群島和棉蘭老島是佳燕皇朝的行政管轄。總面積26.5萬平方公里，相當於四個馬來半島的面積，七個多臺灣的面積。人口500多萬，其中75%是華人。
Half-hearted fight for Sarawak rights?
The Sun Daily on 02 MAY 2019 / 11:42 H. reported that Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali stated that "There will be no referendum on Sarawak’s position in Malaysia". “Our struggles to reclaim Sarawak’s rights must be implemented within the perimeters of the Federal Constitution, within the context of legitimate laws of Malaysia, and within the context of the country of Malaysia. This is our stand."
Piasau YB Datuk Sebastian Ting on Referendum.
The right move for Sarawak - to table and pass Referendum Ordinance in DUN Sarawak. Sebastian Ting spoke on the history and the need to have referendum ordinance tabled and passed in DUN. A video attached below for your easily viewing.
Shared Article: Sarawak in a better position now to reclaim state’s rights
By Peter Sibon
KUCHING, May 4: The recent unanimous decision by state lawmakers in passing the ministerial motion on the state government’s view on the need to amend the Federal Constitution in line with the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), including Article 1(2) and Article 160(2), has been regarded by many Sarawakians as politically and legally correct.
Shared Article: Sarawak decolonization process.
UNFINISHED PROCESS OF DECOLONIZATION UNDER UNDD 1960
You see, Singapore declared UDI (Unilateral Declaration of Independence) on 31 Aug 1963, which was not recognised by Britain and Malaya. For a British colony to have its independence restored, the British Parliament must pass the independence act for the colony.
How much Putrajaya owe Sabah and Sarawak??
KOTA KINABALU: A political activist and adviser to the Sabah government on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) wants Putrajaya to officially declare the amount of money it owes Sabah under Schedule 10 of the Federal Constitution.
"BN Education System has Benefited both PH and BN YBs"
Suara rakyat Sarawak Yesterday at 3:51 PM ·
"Jadi tidak payahlah oleh sebab sekarang jadi kerajaan, tidak payah hendak mengatakan kerajaan dahulu tidak baik"
Shared Article:USUL REFERENDUM ORDINANCE DI DUN SARAWAK?
AMAT luar biasa itulah ayat yang mampu menggambarkan semangat kenyalang yang meresap di sidang mesyuarat Dewan Undangan Negeri Sarawak pada kali ini. Boleh dikatakan hampir setiap hari sidang mesyuarat begitu “panas” dengan perdebatan daripada para ADUN GPS dan juga PH. Selain membawa isu-isu mutakhir di kawasan masing-masing, para ADUN juga setakat ini memberikan pandangan masing-masing tentang apa yang berlaku sekarang.
肯雅兰全民党主席余清禄5月3日文告 ：
砂拉越政府必须坚持立法议会在前天4月30日所通过的有关修宪问题的砂拉越提案，坚决索回完整主权和邦国地位。
今天5月3日报章讯息，砂首长公署发出文告称，如若联邦国会不接受砂立法议会对国会修宪的提案，砂拉越政府也不会寻求公投，不会去投诉联合国。
BIG issue becomes No Issue
Same issue during BN Government era it was a BIG issue and now under PH government same old story is no longer an issue and challenge is dropped and issue forgotten.
口号都白喊了，选票都白投了！
对希望联盟的期望已经变成大失望。竞选宣言就以“竞选宣言不是圣经”把它不当一回事。是选民太好骗还是人民愚昧？海外大马影片导演也对大学以90:10 土著：非土著比例来接受学生而不是以成绩为标准，表示不满，
罗克强 Yb IR Lo Khere Chiang Debate in DUN Sarawak
Robert Lau Hui Yew gave a good summary to the debate in DUN Sarawak as follows:
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much more aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
DUN Sarawak Took The First Bold Step
To some, PH Sarawak debate in DUN was more of a face saving act owing to failed and questionable intention to amend Malaysia Federal Constitution with no real sign of regain equal partnership through the failed amendment attempt. Nevertheless, it is good to see all in DUN said "Yes" in one voice to the tabled motions/proposal. Such unity is essential for the betterment of Sarawak.
Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Patrick Anek Uren
Third of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan
First of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
文章分享 - 何俐萍.迁署与权限, 读后感
作者 ： 何俐萍 文章来源 ： 星洲日报 2019-04-27
读后感。不吐不快。不想憋在心里。砂沙高庭主簿署为什么一定要搬迁到沙巴。要搬迁连首长也蒙在鼓里。完全没把砂首长看在眼里。马来亚霸权还是那么横行霸道。 这一点是足够让90%的砂民愤怒。这是从无限不公平，不公正对待后，何俐萍（东马区副执行篇辑）对这事件谈公平，是否太离谱了？ 是否马来亚为中心，思维和倾向的心太重了? 那些行政署在马来亚也50多年了，为何不搬来砂国，以表示公平这水准。
Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - P. Waythamoorthy
The last of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
“If MA63 is not law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?”
By Nancy Nais KUCHING, April 29:
Sarawak Association for Peoples’ Aspirations (Sapa) president Dominique Ng said if Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then it is not applicable nor binding on its components. Speaking at the ‘Should Sarawakians Support the Amendment to Federal Constitution Article 1(2) Bill as tabled on April 9, 2019, in light of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63)?’ forum yesterday, Ng said according to Malayan constitutional law expert Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi, the MA63 is not a law. “If Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?” Ng asked.
Anak Sarawak spoke
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much nore aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
Anak Malaysia spoke out loud and clear.
Kuota hanya 10% kepada pelajar bukan Bumiputera di 15 pusat matrikulasi seluruh negara tidak adil kerana pusat itu ditanggung oleh wang pembayar cukai.
Record of history
Nancy Shukri fb:
Mungkin ada betul tuduhan saudara Vincent Wong ini. Saya merenung dan terfikir, apakah yang saya "tidak deliver" sebagaimana dituduh Saudara Vincent Wong. Mungkin, ada juga benda yang saya tidak lakukan atau tidak "deliver".
平等理念在人心
尽管印裔组织拉布条抗议、朝野领袖、普罗民众乃至杏坛教师纷纷反对，教长马智礼依旧宣布从今年起，大学预科班学额9：1土著固打制...
对非土著的教育政策又像前朝"国阵"。"新马来西亚"? 怎么了? 要做个"好政府"呀！切记。。
Legal Profession Bill 2019
An article by Voon Lee Shan,
former State Assemblyman for Batu Lintang and Legal Advisor for Parti Bumi Kenyalang
The words used by Dr Yii, MP for Bandar Kuching, "It is basically a proposal to get feedback from the Bar's members and it's associates" to me, seems to indicate that this is a job from the federal government.
PH Government = Tax Collector
PH government is no longer people friendly government but tax collectors?
It seems to be the case when their eyes only focus on how to squeeze an extra Ringgit out of Malaysian citizen.
kenyataan Daripada Yu Chin Liik Pengerusi Parti Bumi Kenyalang
Rakyat Sarawak telah mengalami sekali pertikaian dan telah mencapai persafahaman untuk memastikan kepentingan dan kebaikan Sarawak dipertahankan maka menyeru Kerajaan Sarawak ambil tindakan menggesa pihak professional seperti Persatuan peguam Sarawak, pertubuhan swasta dan pihak parti-parti politik di Sarawak sumbangkan cadangan mereka. Kami rakyat Sarawak menyeru dan menggesa Kerajaan Sarawak akan boleh bertindak:-
Can Mahathir run Malaysia’s economy without blaming Najib or ‘1MDB mess’?
“It won’t be a celebration, more of a reflection.”
That is how a senior member of Malaysia’s government described the televised speech Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad is expected to deliver on May 9, the first anniversary of the Pakatan Harapan coalition’s stunning election win.
肯雅兰全民党主席余清禄文告
据报章讯息 ，4月29日至5月9日召开的砂拉越立法议会，并无提呈任何关于修宪的法案！ 这对期盼砂立法议会能及时对下一步修宪如何走做出及时说明的砂拉越人民而言，的确是对此深感失望。
普遍砂拉越人民对近期联邦希盟政府为践行执政宣言里昭告天下要还回砂沙主权和平等邦国地位的承诺，而进行的国会第一轮修宪 失败感到惋惜。但也认为是一个好的开始。
Negara Sarawak, Negara Sabah
Video that correctly introducing Sabah and Sarawak as countries. Some young PH Sarawak leaders said "Sarawak a country" is a fairytale not knowing the history or only knowing the distorted history is a sad thing.
翻译 Translator
简体中文
Afrikaans
Shqip
العربية
Հայերեն
繁體中文
Dansk
Nederlands
English
Filipino
Suomi
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
हिन्दी
Bahasa Indonesia
Gaelige
Italiano
日本語
ភាសាខ្មែរ
한국어
ພາສາລາວ
Македонски јазик
Bahasa Melayu
മലയാളം
Norsk bokmål
Português
Română
Русский
Español
Svenska
தமிழ்
ไทย
Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
CymraegMost Read 最多人阅读的文章排行版
- Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - P. Waythamoorthy
- 10 unlikeable things about Dr M
- 砂獨立後誰是國家領導 溫利山：不是我的事情
- 砂拉越人对联邦政府的失信有权表达他们失望和不满
- 回应马来西亚首相在国会中所说的话
- 砂擁自我決策權力 黃錦河：為何要被對付?
- 让人哭笑不得
- 砂拉越有权脱离马来西亚?
- 借刀杀人讨好敦马
- 恳求砂拉越人民支持砂拉越独立探索中的肯雅兰全民党
- 何俐萍.砂拉越人还心系纳吉？
- 谁疯了？
- 政府钱太多？
- 不称职的政治人物
- 脱马提问引谩骂污蔑 刘强燕评击批评者心虚怕被戮破真相
- 骂农民活该？！
- 公账会报告打脸林冠英！
- 温利山回应林冠英 “够了！请出去”
- 沙巴和砂拉越人民要的是真正的三邦平等地位和完整的砂主权回归
- 尋求砂獨立路線已開始 溫利山盼獲全民支持
QR Code 肯雅兰之声二维码
Total Viewers Since 1 Dec 2018 从2018年12月1日至今总拜访人数
- 页面访问数：
- 256805