肯雅兰之声是由一群关心砂拉越的未来发展的砂拉越人发起，目的是尽量为砂拉越人民提供即时的有关砂拉越的发展消息，一起从古至今了解砂拉越事实情况并探讨砂拉越未来的路何去何从。 砂拉越和沙巴人民最关心的是建立马来西亚的国际公约，就是马来西亚公约1963 (MA63)。这公约说明了马来西亚是由三邦成立，三邦就是砂拉越，沙巴和马来亚。没有砂拉越和沙巴就没有马来西亚。没有“马来西亚公约1963”也就没有马来西亚。
This website is established by a group of concern Sarawakian with the aim to provide latest news of Sarawak. Learning from the past and charting new path for the future. Sabah and Sarawak people main concern is the restoration of Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) which had been properly registered at United Nation (UN), and MA63 is the foundation of formation of Malaysia. During formation of Malaysia, Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya are equal partners therefore any ACTS, laws, regulation and policies passed in parliament (with the intention to restrict or nullify full function of Malaysia Agreement 1963) are illegal and therefore are against the very foundation of formation of Malaysia at the disadvantage of Sarawak and Sabah with the intention to remove equal partners status of Sarawak and Sabah making Sabah and Sarawak one of the states in Malaysia.
砂拉越行动党为什么那么介意人联党党领袖,在砂拉越会议中讲解砂拉越历史并说明在砂拉越会议提呈“公投法”(Referendum Ordinance)? 这是砂拉越朝向更民主的“全砂拉越人民的民主工具”，让人民可以在情况需要时，人民可以启动公投法让人民做决定。为什么砂拉越希望联盟自称还是砂拉越子民，不愿意看到“公投法令”成真？
Strike when the iron is hot - one year after PH took over, is PH sincere to Sarawak? Has it steered Malaysia on the path of moderation?
The new government of PH led by Tun Dr Mahathir did set out by striking when the iron is hot.
From Sarawak point of view, the Tun Mahathir 2.0, struck immediately against Sarawak when one month after coming into power, Petronas sued Sarawak Government asking the court to basically seize our oil and our right to impose sales tax under our State law, Oil Mining Ordinance 1958.
4 也通过教育部拨出24亿6400 万令吉予玛拉工艺大学 UiTM，
Have Referendum Ordinance, SUPP rep tells Sarawak assembly
KUCHING: A SUPP assemblyman has called on the Sarawak legislative assembly to consider the viability of a Referendum Ordinance on matters concerning the state’s rights and interests.
Audrian Len Facebook Article Shared:
The 1MDB RM2.6Billion case probably has annoyed Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia may have been seen as an "accomplice" in the 1MDB case.
The Sun Daily on 02 MAY 2019 / 11:42 H. reported that Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali stated that "There will be no referendum on Sarawak’s position in Malaysia". “Our struggles to reclaim Sarawak’s rights must be implemented within the perimeters of the Federal Constitution, within the context of legitimate laws of Malaysia, and within the context of the country of Malaysia. This is our stand."
The right move for Sarawak - to table and pass Referendum Ordinance in DUN Sarawak. Sebastian Ting spoke on the history and the need to have referendum ordinance tabled and passed in DUN. A video attached below for your easily viewing.
By Peter Sibon
KUCHING, May 4: The recent unanimous decision by state lawmakers in passing the ministerial motion on the state government’s view on the need to amend the Federal Constitution in line with the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), including Article 1(2) and Article 160(2), has been regarded by many Sarawakians as politically and legally correct.
UNFINISHED PROCESS OF DECOLONIZATION UNDER UNDD 1960
You see, Singapore declared UDI (Unilateral Declaration of Independence) on 31 Aug 1963, which was not recognised by Britain and Malaya. For a British colony to have its independence restored, the British Parliament must pass the independence act for the colony.
KOTA KINABALU: A political activist and adviser to the Sabah government on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) wants Putrajaya to officially declare the amount of money it owes Sabah under Schedule 10 of the Federal Constitution.
Suara rakyat Sarawak Yesterday at 3:51 PM ·
"Jadi tidak payahlah oleh sebab sekarang jadi kerajaan, tidak payah hendak mengatakan kerajaan dahulu tidak baik"
AMAT luar biasa itulah ayat yang mampu menggambarkan semangat kenyalang yang meresap di sidang mesyuarat Dewan Undangan Negeri Sarawak pada kali ini. Boleh dikatakan hampir setiap hari sidang mesyuarat begitu “panas” dengan perdebatan daripada para ADUN GPS dan juga PH. Selain membawa isu-isu mutakhir di kawasan masing-masing, para ADUN juga setakat ini memberikan pandangan masing-masing tentang apa yang berlaku sekarang.
Same issue during BN Government era it was a BIG issue and now under PH government same old story is no longer an issue and challenge is dropped and issue forgotten.
Bintulu mp Dato Seri Tiong King Sing raised the issue in Parliament.
Robert Lau Hui Yew gave a good summary to the debate in DUN Sarawak as follows:
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much more aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
ADUN Nangka, YB Dr Annuar Rapaee is kryptonite to YB Chong Chieng Jen?
To some, PH Sarawak debate in DUN was more of a face saving act owing to failed and questionable intention to amend Malaysia Federal Constitution with no real sign of regain equal partnership through the failed amendment attempt. Nevertheless, it is good to see all in DUN said "Yes" in one voice to the tabled motions/proposal. Such unity is essential for the betterment of Sarawak.
Third of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
First of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
作者 ： 何俐萍 文章来源 ： 星洲日报 2019-04-27
读后感。不吐不快。不想憋在心里。砂沙高庭主簿署为什么一定要搬迁到沙巴。要搬迁连首长也蒙在鼓里。完全没把砂首长看在眼里。马来亚霸权还是那么横行霸道。 这一点是足够让90%的砂民愤怒。这是从无限不公平，不公正对待后，何俐萍（东马区副执行篇辑）对这事件谈公平，是否太离谱了？ 是否马来亚为中心，思维和倾向的心太重了? 那些行政署在马来亚也50多年了，为何不搬来砂国，以表示公平这水准。
The last of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.