Welcome To Voice Of Kenyalang 肯雅兰之声,欢迎您!

肯雅兰之声是由一群关心砂拉越的未来发展的砂拉越人发起,目的是尽量为砂拉越人民提供即时的有关砂拉越的发展消息,一起从古至今了解砂拉越事实情况并探讨砂拉越未来的路何去何从。 砂拉越和沙巴人民最关心的是建立马来西亚的国际公约,就是马来西亚公约1963 (MA63)。这公约说明了马来西亚是由三邦成立,三邦就是砂拉越,沙巴和马来亚。没有砂拉越和沙巴就没有马来西亚。没有“马来西亚公约1963”也就没有马来西亚。

所以“马来西亚公约1963”是不可被修改不可以被取消。没有得到砂拉越政府和人民同意之下不可以以其他方法修改马来西亚的宪法和通过新法令来限制“马来西亚公约1963”权利,危害砂拉越和沙巴的主权和利益。现今情况明显抵触了“马来西亚公约1963”,也动摇了马来西亚建国基础。

This website is established by a group of concern Sarawakian with the aim to provide latest news of Sarawak. Learning from the past and charting new path for the future. Sabah and Sarawak people main concern is the restoration of Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) which had been properly registered at United Nation (UN), and MA63 is the foundation of formation of Malaysia. During formation of Malaysia, Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya are equal partners therefore any ACTS, laws, regulation and policies passed in parliament (with the intention to restrict or nullify full function of Malaysia Agreement 1963)  are illegal and therefore are against the very foundation of formation of Malaysia at the disadvantage of Sarawak and Sabah with the intention to remove equal partners status of Sarawak and Sabah making Sabah and Sarawak one of the states in Malaysia.

Voon Lee ShanDatuk Seri Dr. Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jafaar is again reminded that the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is an invalid international agreement under international law. Since it is an invalid international agreement, no right in the invalid agreement could be implemented, restored or reinstated. The MA63 was invalid for many reasons.

First, the Cobbold Commission and findings of the Cobbold Commission was against international law.

The findings of the Cobbold Commission could also be a fraud because Tan Sri Muhammad Ghazali Shafie and Wong Pau Nee, who were members of Cobbold Commission and being Malayans, were interested parties that could influence the decisions of the Commission.

Since none among the five of them in the Cobbold Commission was able to speak native and local malay languages, how could they be able to find out the wishes of 4000 odd people whom they interviewed wanted Malaysia to be formed? How could these small numbers of people able to represent the voices of about a million people of Sabah and Sarawak? At the time of signing, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak, being still colonies of United Kingdom had no legal capacity under international law, to sign the said MA63.

The fact that MA63 could be registered with the United Nations does not mean that it not challengeable as invalid treaty or a fraud.

The advisory opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on 25 February 2019 on the Chagos Island case to say that colonies are incapable to make treaties with parent countries is crystal clear on this.

Even if MA63 was validly signed, the fundamental breaches of MA63 plus Singapore’s exit from the federation of Malaysia, had caused the agreement to collapse and invalid. I hope this is clear to the de facto law minister, Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jafaar and to all members of parliament from Sabah and Sarawak.

The law minister erred in fact and in law to say Sarawak had already achieved independence.

If Sarawak had been given independence by the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom could not, under international law, handed Sarawak together with Sabah and Singapore as a gift to Malaya. This made it difficult to convince many Sabahans and Sarawakians that Sabah and Sarawak are not colonies of Malaya.

I am afraid that any member of parliament or ministers from Sabah and Sarawak who seek to amend the MA63 or who seek the restoration of the terms and conditions in the MA63 would be viewed by Sabahans and Sarawakians as not protecting or acting in the interest of Sabah and Sarawak.

I foresee that any amendment and or restoration of any rights that had been breached in the MA63 would one day be challenged in court Sabahans and Sarawakians. Many West Malaysians and people in Kalimantan at the moment are harbouring their hope of this to happen in the very near future. This is because they viewed Sabah and Sarawak had not been treated fairly by being short-changed by Malaya with their oil and gas being taken away.

What the law minister should do is to inform parliament that MA63 is indeed invalid and ought to be disregarded. In Parti Bumi Kenyalang’s (PBK) assessments concerning the handling of MA63 in parliament at the moment, not only Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jafaar but the YAB Chief Minister Abang Abdul Rahman Zohari Tun Openg would find it difficult to defend their seats in coming elections.

翻译 Translator

free website promotion SubmitX.com

Offer A Gift To Support Parti Bumi Kenyalang (以财礼方式来支援肯雅兰全民党)

Parti Bumi Kenyalang is a multi-racial political party in Sarawak and having an achievable mission :"IN QUEST OF INDEPENDENCE".

We plan to field 82 candidates in the coming Sarawak Election. We are not taking any donations but your gifts in appreciation of our struggles are appreciated. 

肯雅兰全民党是砂拉越的多元种族政党,其使命是可实现的:“追求独立之路”。我们计划在即将到来的砂拉越大选中派出82名候选人,因此我们需要砂拉越人民和海外支持者在经济上以财礼(gift) 方式来支援我们。

Click Here To Offer A Gift

(以财礼方式来支援我们)

Supportpbk

Pbk Donation

Parti Bumi Kenyalang Facebook "Live" 肯雅兰全民党面子书直播

Parti Bumi Kenyalang Facebook Live

Voice Of Kenyalang QR Code 肯雅兰之声二维码

QRcode

Total Viewers Since 1 Dec 2018 从2018年12月1日至今总拜访人数

页面访问数:
1809564

Current No Of Online Viewers 线上游览者人数

在线: 51  个访客 和 0 个会员