Welcome To Voice Of Kenyalang 肯雅兰之声,欢迎您!

肯雅兰之声是由一群关心砂拉越的未来发展的砂拉越人发起,目的是尽量为砂拉越人民提供即时的有关砂拉越的发展消息,一起从古至今了解砂拉越事实情况并探讨砂拉越未来的路何去何从。 砂拉越和沙巴人民最关心的是建立马来西亚的国际公约,就是马来西亚公约1963 (MA63)。这公约说明了马来西亚是由三邦成立,三邦就是砂拉越,沙巴和马来亚。没有砂拉越和沙巴就没有马来西亚。没有“马来西亚公约1963”也就没有马来西亚。

所以“马来西亚公约1963”是不可被修改不可以被取消。没有得到砂拉越政府和人民同意之下不可以以其他方法修改马来西亚的宪法和通过新法令来限制“马来西亚公约1963”权利,危害砂拉越和沙巴的主权和利益。现今情况明显抵触了“马来西亚公约1963”,也动摇了马来西亚建国基础。

This website is established by a group of concern Sarawakian with the aim to provide latest news of Sarawak. Learning from the past and charting new path for the future. Sabah and Sarawak people main concern is the restoration of Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) which had been properly registered at United Nation (UN), and MA63 is the foundation of formation of Malaysia. During formation of Malaysia, Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya are equal partners therefore any ACTS, laws, regulation and policies passed in parliament (with the intention to restrict or nullify full function of Malaysia Agreement 1963)  are illegal and therefore are against the very foundation of formation of Malaysia at the disadvantage of Sarawak and Sabah with the intention to remove equal partners status of Sarawak and Sabah making Sabah and Sarawak one of the states in Malaysia.

Voonls Ps2sep21
(In reply to statement by Tan Sri James Masing appeared in Dayak Daily -16 September, 2021) Tan Sri Dr. James Masing is ill advised if he said that Sarawak could not seek independence or secede from the federation of Malaysia when he said this was not provided for in the federal constitution. Tan was Sri James Masing may need to know that there is no provision in the federal constitution to say Sabah and Sarawak could not secede from the federation.

Before Malaysia was formed, Tunku Abdul Rahman, when he was prime minister of Malaya, had made it clear that Sabah and Sarawak were free to leave the federation if the federation brings no benefit to Sabah and Sarawak – see Borneo Times 18 July 1963.

Dr. James Masing may wish to be informed that the Malaysia Agreement 1963(MA63) that led to the formation of Malaysia was an invalid international agreement or treaty. International legal experts, including a law professor from Canada whom I consulted recently when he was in Sarawak, opined that without a valid treaty, the formation of Malaysia was tainted with fraud under international law.

The Chagos Islands case decided by the International Court of Justice recently was clear on this point of law, in which, the court opined that a colony could not make a valid treaty with her parent colonial masters. At the time the MA63 was signed, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore were still colonies of UK. This made the MA63 Treaty invalid. Even if valid, the fundamental breaches of the Treaty had caused the Treaty to collapse and Malaysia should by right, disintegrate.

Dr. James Masing also spoke about unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) by Kosovo. ICJ opined that the exit by Kosovo in 2008 from Serbia by unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) did not go against international law. Kosovo is now an independent nation.

Sarawak has many grounds to enable herself be freed from the federation. Since Malaysia was formed, Sarawak had annually lost more than RM100 billion ringgit in terms of her wealth and revenues to the federal government and to Petronas with a return of about RM4 billion only as her annual development fund.

Dr. James may wish to visit the schools in the rural areas and he may find that we have too many dilapidated schools left unrepaired with many schools which are in very poor conditions.

In rural areas there are many areas with no treated water, electricity and roads. Instead of Borneosation of the civil service, what we now see most government departments are occupied by officers from Malaya. We do not, unlike what Malaya has, any highway, but, a dual carriageway with potholes, uneven surfaces with dangerous bends creating death traps along the way from Sematan to Lawas. People are poor and we have too many families hardly have enough good meals every day.

Are not these oppressions and suppressions, Dr. James? These are all against human rights.

Sarawak had lost her oil and gas, continental shelf to Malaya and to Petronas and why had GPS been doing for the past 58 years to take them back?

All these are good grounds under international law to seek exit from the federation. If the federal government could not put things right, the federal government could not stop Sabah and Sarawak to exit. When a marriage failed or could no more be patched up, there is nothing a court will not allow the divorce.

Parti Bumi Kenyalang will pursue Sarawak independence by peaceful and legal means and this the party line of campaign at the moment.

翻译 Translator

free website promotion SubmitX.com

Offer A Gift To Support Parti Bumi Kenyalang (以财礼方式来支援肯雅兰全民党)

Parti Bumi Kenyalang is a multi-racial political party in Sarawak and having an achievable mission :"IN QUEST OF INDEPENDENCE".

We plan to field 82 candidates in the coming Sarawak Election. We are not taking any donations but your gifts in appreciation of our struggles are appreciated. 

肯雅兰全民党是砂拉越的多元种族政党,其使命是可实现的:“追求独立之路”。我们计划在即将到来的砂拉越大选中派出82名候选人,因此我们需要砂拉越人民和海外支持者在经济上以财礼(gift) 方式来支援我们。

Click Here To Offer A Gift

(以财礼方式来支援我们)

Supportpbk

Pbk Donation

Parti Bumi Kenyalang Facebook "Live" 肯雅兰全民党面子书直播

Parti Bumi Kenyalang Facebook Live

Voice Of Kenyalang QR Code 肯雅兰之声二维码

QRcode

Total Viewers Since 1 Dec 2018 从2018年12月1日至今总拜访人数

页面访问数:
1809526

Current No Of Online Viewers 线上游览者人数

在线: 99  个访客 和 0 个会员