Robert Lau Hui Yew gave a good summary to the debate in DUN Sarawak as follows:
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much more aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
ADUN Nangka, YB Dr Annuar Rapaee is kryptonite to YB Chong Chieng Jen?
To some, PH Sarawak debate in DUN was more of a face saving act owing to failed and questionable intention to amend Malaysia Federal Constitution with no real sign of regain equal partnership through the failed amendment attempt. Nevertheless, it is good to see all in DUN said "Yes" in one voice to the tabled motions/proposal. Such unity is essential for the betterment of Sarawak.
The last of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
阅读全文: Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - P. Waythamoorthy
By Nancy Nais KUCHING, April 29:
Sarawak Association for Peoples’ Aspirations (Sapa) president Dominique Ng said if Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then it is not applicable nor binding on its components. Speaking at the ‘Should Sarawakians Support the Amendment to Federal Constitution Article 1(2) Bill as tabled on April 9, 2019, in light of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63)?’ forum yesterday, Ng said according to Malayan constitutional law expert Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi, the MA63 is not a law. “If Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?” Ng asked.
阅读全文: “If MA63 is not law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?”
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much nore aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
We need more Sarawak natives to speak their minds
What a confusing explanation.
Why not say what is the hope of the People of Sarawak and Sabah?
It is not even just our hope. It is our legal rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963.
Amendment to Federal Constitution of Malaysia to restore Sabah and Sarawak to equal partners status with Malaya and the amendment is just restructuring the sentence without changing the meaning or the existing status of Sabah and Sarawak against the wishes of Sabah and Sarawak people. This is clearly a political scam.
KUCHING: All Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) Members of Parliament (MPs) objected to the amendment Bill to Article 1 (2) of the Federal Constitution tabled in Parliament at noon today.
阅读全文: GPS MPs, legal experts less than impressed with Bill to amend Article 1 (2)
KUCHING: A Sarawak minister has criticised DAP’s Dr Kelvin Yii for claiming that it is normal for the drafted bill of Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution to be disclosed only during the first reading.
阅读全文: Elected reps should get details of bill a week before reading, says Sarawak minister
If PH Federal government is sincere in restoring Sabah and Sarawak to its equal partners status with Malaya then such sincerity should be shown by letting Sabah and Sarawak people know beforehand the contents of the intended amendment of federal Constitution.
阅读全文: Sincere in restoring Sabah and Sarawak to its equal partners status with Malaya?
hen prioritising development projects in Sarawak one might consider the many rural communities still lacking basic infrastructure and amenities such as clean water, electricity and access to adequate schools and hospitals in the state.
If such assistance can be given to Sarawak children one could easily perceive he has discharged his duty correctly but .... as a Miri MP his priority is elsewhere?
Dead fish floating among the debris in the river. — Photo by Muhammad Rais Sanusi
Whose responsibility is it? What causes it?Who is the culprit? And how to prevent it from repeating? The problem is now reported in newspaper where is the investigation and solution?
KUCHING: Sarawak’s de facto law minister is grateful for the federal cabinet’s decision to table a proposal to restore Sabah and Sarawak’s status as equal partners, but not without strong reservations.
阅读全文: Hasidah: Equal status not enough, return state’s rights
Ten years jail term is too harsh by whatever standard especially when compared to abolishment of death sentence. If death sentence won't deter growth of crime 10 years jail term will do good for a young man? It will waste his time in jail and might harden his stand against the establishment.
Sarawak territory and it's autonomy
Is it all good news??
It all depends on what's to be amended and how it is amended. Before we see the content of the proposed amendment it is too early to celebrate the return of Sabah and Sarawak full rights.
The amendment should nullify all laws, ACTS,, regulations, and agreement that were passed against MALAYSIA AGREEMENT 1963 (MA63). Without rectifying these, the amendment is nothing and meaningless but a trap for Sabah and Sarawak and the amendment might be used as a legal means to legalised past wrong doing/treatment to Sabah and Sarawak.
阅读全文: Putrajaya to amend constitution to restore Sabah, Sarawak status
Parti Bumi Kenyalang is a multi-racial political party in Sarawak and having an achievable mission :"IN QUEST OF INDEPENDENCE".
We plan to field 82 candidates in the coming Sarawak Election. We are not taking any donations but your gifts in appreciation of our struggles are appreciated.
肯雅兰全民党是砂拉越的多元种族政党,其使命是可实现的:“追求独立之路”。我们计划在即将到来的砂拉越大选中派出82名候选人,因此我们需要砂拉越人民和海外支持者在经济上以财礼(gift) 方式来支援我们。
![]() |
Download PBK Passport
(for reference only)
下载肯雅兰全民党:使命护照
(只共参考)