The public is entitled to ask: Is the Mayor performing the duties of an independent public servant, or has he become a de facto political representative of a political leader?
A Mayor occupies a public office. He is paid by public funds and entrusted to serve all ratepayers regardless of their political affiliation. He must not only be impartial, but must also be seen to be impartial.
The concern is one of public confidence. When a Mayor is repeatedly seen representing a political leader at public events, it creates the perception that the line between public administration and party politics is becoming blurred.
This raises an important question. If a politically connected individual, a member of SUPP, or a person aligned with GPS is found to have breached local council by-laws, erected illegal structures, or committed planning violations, will the law be enforced with the same firmness and impartiality as against an ordinary citizen?
Across Kuching, illegal extensions and unauthorised structures appear to be mushrooming. Some are eyesores. Some create safety hazards. Some may even endanger lives. The public must have confidence that enforcement is carried out fairly, consistently and without fear or favour.
The rule of law cannot operate on the basis of political connections. The law must be blind to political status, party membership and influence.
A Mayor must be a guardian of public interest, not a participant in partisan politics. Public servants should remain public servants. Politicians should remain politicians. The separation between the two is essential to preserve public trust, accountability and good governance.
The people of Kuching deserve assurance that the local government will be administered independently, professionally, and in accordance with the law, and that no individual, regardless of political standing, is above the law.
VOON LEE SHAN
President
Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK)
8 June 2026