The recent call by Daro Assemblyman Safiee Ahmad in the Sarawak Legislature for authorities to take action against former Law Minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim—merely for expressing his views on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63)—is a blatant display of political immaturity and insecurity.

For a sitting lawmaker to accuse Datuk Zaid of “inciting dissatisfaction” and liken him to “a termite destroying harmony” is not only inflammatory but exposes a worrying ignorance of the fundamental rights of the Borneo states. Many Sarawakians whom I have spoken to view his comments as arrogant and uninformed, especially on the long-standing right of the Borneo territories to question, evaluate, and even pursue self-determination when the federation no longer functions in their interest.

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim did nothing more than voice a legitimate, widely shared concern: Is the Federation of Malaysia today still operating in accordance with the spirit, promises, and obligations of MA63?

Instead of responding with maturity, the lawmaker chose the path of intimidation—an approach utterly unbefitting of a democratic society.

Dissent is not a crime—silencing it is a sign of a failing political culture

In a healthy democracy, differing views—especially on foundational issues such as MA63—must be debated openly, intelligently, and respectfully. Suppressing opinion through threats or administrative action is the hallmark of authoritarian instinct, not leadership.

Datuk Zaid’s remarks should serve as an urgent reminder for all Malaysians to assess whether the federation, as it exists today, still protects the rights, dignity, and aspirations of Sabahans and Sarawakians. If it no longer does, then it is not only appropriate but necessary to re-evaluate the future of the relationship—peacefully, democratically, and with full respect for the principles of justice and equality.

Political leaders must face questions—not silence those who raise them

It is deeply irresponsible for any elected representative to attempt to muscle through political problems by shutting down discourse. Doing so only fuels public discontent, especially when dissatisfaction with federal policies is already widespread in Sarawak.

If the federal government or its allies believe the federation is strong, fair, and beneficial, then they should have nothing to fear from open discussion.
Only those uncertain of their own legitimacy resort to silencing critics.

Moving forward with integrity

Malaysia can only progress if its leaders embrace open dialogue instead of political suppression. The people of Sarawak deserve leaders who understand MA63, respect democratic freedoms, and possess the maturity to handle differing opinions without resorting to threats.

PBK stands firmly for the right of Sarawakians to speak, question, and decide our own future. The era of intimidation is over.
The era of accountability has begun.