The Federal Constitution does not confer upon the Prime Minister a personal or unilateral power to wage war or deploy the armed forces according to his own political decision.
阅读全文: NO MILITARY AGGRESSION AGAINST A PEACEFUL AND LAWFUL CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS
阅读全文: Siphoning Sarawak’s Wealth: The Tabung Haji RCI and the Case for Bornean Sovereignty
The federal government's recent position on the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 raises important questions about the legal basis for preventing assemblies at public spaces such as the Central Padang in Kuching.
阅读全文: Words Aren't Enough: Action Needed on Sarawak’s Rice Self-Sufficiency
The Sarawak government will launch a pilot project to cultivate perennial rice in the Daro and Matu areas as part of efforts to strengthen the state’s food security through the adoption of modern agricultural technology - Source: Gedong Express Friday 17 July, 2026
阅读全文: Perennial Rice Pilots vs. RM1 Billion Pledges: Sarawakians Want Results, Not Publicity
阅读全文: Voon Lee Shan: Sarawak Deserves a Fair Fiscal Settlement to Support Essential Development
Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) welcomes efforts to expand educational and career opportunities for the people of Sarawak. However, the success of any Education Fair or Career Expo organised by the GPS Government should not be measured merely by attendance figures or publicity, but by whether it genuinely reaches and benefits all Sarawakians, particularly those living in rural and remote areas.
阅读全文: Voon: Education Fair and GPS Government Career Expo Must Not Leave Rural Sarawakians Behind
阅读全文: Broken Promises Prove Sarawak Needs Local, Independent Politics
I express my regret over the ugly scene that unfolded during a pro-Palestinian demonstration in Kuala Lumpur, where a heated confrontation between demonstrators and a foreign woman ultimately required police intervention.
阅读全文: Upholding National Dignity and Civility in Public Discourse
Mr. Leslie Ting Siong Ngiap, Chairman of Parti Bumi Kenyalang (Miri Division) and Supreme Council Organising Secretary, stated that the Federal Government has yet to fully implement the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), increase Sarawak’s parliamentary representation, return ownership rights over oil and gas resources, or restore sovereignty over areas such as education, healthcare, and taxation because there is currently no political party in the Sarawak Legislative Assembly advocating for independence. As a result, the Federal Government faces no significant political pressure to make swift concessions.
阅读全文: Leslie Ting: Sarawakians Will Continue to Pay the Price of Unfulfilled MA63 Demands Without...
阅读全文: Voon Lee Shan: Mayors Are Public Servants, Not Partisan Spokespersons
阅读全文: Why Should Sarawak Thank Putrajaya for a Bridge We Funded Ourselves?
阅读全文: Navigating Federal Turbulence While Sustaining Sarawak’s Stability
阅读全文: Six Decades of Waiting Is Enough: Why MA63 Has Lost Its Legitimacy
The formation of Malaysia was not a simple merger; it was a high-stakes international treaty known as the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). However, a series of legislative maneuvers and procedural anomalies have led many to question the very foundation of the Federation. Central to this debate is the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA 2012) and the controversial registration of MA63 with the United Nations.
阅读全文: The Legal Mirage: Why TSA 2012 and the 1970 UN Registration Threaten Sarawak’s Sovereignty
Borneo’s Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo) expresses deep concern over the recent remarks by the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Sabah and Sarawak Affairs), Datuk Ts Mustapha Sakmud, who highlighted the billions spent by the Federal Government on petrol and diesel subsidies as evidence of Putrajaya’s commitment to protecting Malaysians from rising global oil prices.