对希望联盟的期望已经变成大失望。竞选宣言就以“竞选宣言不是圣经”把它不当一回事。是选民太好骗还是人民愚昧?海外大马影片导演也对大学以90:10 土著:非土著比例来接受学生而不是以成绩为标准,表示不满,
Robert Lau Hui Yew gave a good summary to the debate in DUN Sarawak as follows:
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much more aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
To some, PH Sarawak debate in DUN was more of a face saving act owing to failed and questionable intention to amend Malaysia Federal Constitution with no real sign of regain equal partnership through the failed amendment attempt. Nevertheless, it is good to see all in DUN said "Yes" in one voice to the tabled motions/proposal. Such unity is essential for the betterment of Sarawak.
Third of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
First of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
作者 : 何俐萍 文章来源 : 星洲日报 2019-04-27
读后感。不吐不快。不想憋在心里。砂沙高庭主簿署为什么一定要搬迁到沙巴。要搬迁连首长也蒙在鼓里。完全没把砂首长看在眼里。马来亚霸权还是那么横行霸道。 这一点是足够让90%的砂民愤怒。这是从无限不公平,不公正对待后,何俐萍(东马区副执行篇辑)对这事件谈公平,是否太离谱了? 是否马来亚为中心,思维和倾向的心太重了? 那些行政署在马来亚也50多年了,为何不搬来砂国,以表示公平这水准。
The last of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
By Nancy Nais KUCHING, April 29:
Sarawak Association for Peoples’ Aspirations (Sapa) president Dominique Ng said if Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then it is not applicable nor binding on its components. Speaking at the ‘Should Sarawakians Support the Amendment to Federal Constitution Article 1(2) Bill as tabled on April 9, 2019, in light of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63)?’ forum yesterday, Ng said according to Malayan constitutional law expert Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi, the MA63 is not a law. “If Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?” Ng asked.
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much nore aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
Kuota hanya 10% kepada pelajar bukan Bumiputera di 15 pusat matrikulasi seluruh negara tidak adil kerana pusat itu ditanggung oleh wang pembayar cukai.
Nancy Shukri fb:
Mungkin ada betul tuduhan saudara Vincent Wong ini. Saya merenung dan terfikir, apakah yang saya "tidak deliver" sebagaimana dituduh Saudara Vincent Wong. Mungkin, ada juga benda yang saya tidak lakukan atau tidak "deliver".
尽管印裔组织拉布条抗议、朝野领袖、普罗民众乃至杏坛教师纷纷反对,教长马智礼依旧宣布从今年起,大学预科班学额9:1土著固打制...
对非土著的教育政策又像前朝"国阵"。"新马来西亚"? 怎么了? 要做个"好政府"呀!切记。。
An article by Voon Lee Shan,
former State Assemblyman for Batu Lintang and Legal Advisor for Parti Bumi Kenyalang
The words used by Dr Yii, MP for Bandar Kuching, "It is basically a proposal to get feedback from the Bar's members and it's associates" to me, seems to indicate that this is a job from the federal government.
PH government is no longer people friendly government but tax collectors?
It seems to be the case when their eyes only focus on how to squeeze an extra Ringgit out of Malaysian citizen.
Rakyat Sarawak telah mengalami sekali pertikaian dan telah mencapai persafahaman untuk memastikan kepentingan dan kebaikan Sarawak dipertahankan maka menyeru Kerajaan Sarawak ambil tindakan menggesa pihak professional seperti Persatuan peguam Sarawak, pertubuhan swasta dan pihak parti-parti politik di Sarawak sumbangkan cadangan mereka. Kami rakyat Sarawak menyeru dan menggesa Kerajaan Sarawak akan boleh bertindak:-
“It won’t be a celebration, more of a reflection.”
That is how a senior member of Malaysia’s government described the televised speech Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad is expected to deliver on May 9, the first anniversary of the Pakatan Harapan coalition’s stunning election win.
据报章讯息 ,4月29日至5月9日召开的砂拉越立法议会,并无提呈任何关于修宪的法案! 这对期盼砂立法议会能及时对下一步修宪如何走做出及时说明的砂拉越人民而言,的确是对此深感失望。
普遍砂拉越人民对近期联邦希盟政府为践行执政宣言里昭告天下要还回砂沙主权和平等邦国地位的承诺,而进行的国会第一轮修宪 失败感到惋惜。但也认为是一个好的开始。
Video that correctly introducing Sabah and Sarawak as countries. Some young PH Sarawak leaders said "Sarawak a country" is a fairytale not knowing the history or only knowing the distorted history is a sad thing.
Before Rakyat put him in minister post he talked with no fear and with principle. Sadly after becoming minister he would not talk like this anymore. What is happening to him? He is a Sarawakian and yet he no longer dares to champion Sarawak's interest and rights. Disappointed by such drastic change of attitude and behavior. Is he still anak Sarawak?
聯合國大會第一五四一(十五)號決議(United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV))是联合国大会于1960年12月15日所通過的联合国会员国确定是否负有义务递送联合国宪章第七十三条(辰)款规定的情报所应遵循的原则。
The former Chief Minister of Sabah, Tun Fuad Stephen had this to say in 1962: My people feel that if North Borneo joins Malaya now as a State, it would infact meant that North Borneo would become not a State but a Colony of the Federation of Malaya. As I have said before, the fears are genuine. Not actually or suspicion of the sincerity to take on as equal partner but more the fear that by virtue of our status as a British Colony we would automatically become a second class State or a Colony of Malaya.
温利山说﹕砂政府只要求在联邦宪法第1(2)条文修改上增加6个字眼﹐即“Pursuant to the Malaysia Agreement 1963”(根据1963年马来西亚契约)。但是﹐希盟政府却拒绝这么做。刘伟强说加入该6个字眼将使该条文更复杂。温利山﹕但是﹐希盟政府没有向公众解释它如何使该条文更复杂。希盟政府有义务向人民解释。新加坡于1965年在沙、砂不知情及允许的情况下退出。也许这就是联邦政府拒绝在联邦宪法第1(2)条文修改中加入该6个字眼的原因。
赖耀松 : 根据联邦宪法121项(4)条文阐明,决定沙巴和砂拉越高等法院主簿署的地点,要由最高元首御淮,惟必须事先是获得首相建议下批准。而后者(首相)也必须要咨询沙巴和砂拉越的首席部长的同意,以及高庭大法官(Chief Judge)的同意。从刘伟强今天发表的文告很明显,首相之前并没有向尤其是寻求砂拉越首席部长的同意。这已是违宪做法。身为律师更要比普通人更遵重法律和国家宪法,绝对不能把国家法律玩弄于股掌。
Malaysia Agreement 1963 Survey
有关马来西亚协议和修宪的民意调查
Do you know the Malaysia Agreement 1963 in detail? * 您知道1963年马来西亚契约的详细内容吗?
Do you think the recent Federal Government actions is sincere to amend the Federal Constitution to restore equal partner status to Sabah & Sarawak? * ......
您认为最近联邦政府修宪举动是真心诚意要恢复砂、沙与马来亚半岛三邦之间平等伙伴地位吗?......
看东铁我怀疑当局·有两重心:
1)落实东铁对中马经贸发展是正面的。
2)联邦政府可以随手抛出4百多亿去落实马来亚的工程计划,而砂的年发展拨款才40亿, 说好的10亿修残校以抵債方式落实, 财长林冠英却横刀 - 挡 -不准, 把小学生当政治筹码; 砂高速公路龟速的工程进展,搞的乱七八糟; 不少利民工程被希盟砍掉 ;摆明在处处勺难砂人民,剥夺砂人权益迫使砂人就范,悲哀。
国际法庭重审国际法规则~~~只有独立的主权国家才有权制定(国际)条约。作者是Joe Fernandez在2019年4月15日发表一篇具有影响力的文章。他是一个具有行政管理学荣誉学位,主修经济,也完成法律学位,现在在吉隆坡、沙巴和砂拉越教学英语。作者是一个长期关注婆罗洲、勤于研究马来亚的历史与法律。鉴于马来西亚从脱胎就是一个残缺不全的婴孩。修宪已经不能修补残缺不全的马来西亚计划,也帮不上沙巴和砂拉越走向自治独立之路。英国或者马来西亚联邦政府也不会出面协助。作者Joe Fernandez的文章强烈地提示沙、砂的人民需改变自己的思维,再不要固守在修改联邦宪法条文上兜圈子。应该走出去,走自己的路,寻求联合国的协助~~~向国际法院申诉沙巴和砂拉越人民寻求自治独立的困境。
Malaysia Agreement 1963 is supposed to sign Sabah, Singapore, Sarawak and federation of Malaya into a new country called Malaysia. Malaysian believe that is fact .
目前,砂出现三股声音,除了支持和反对的声音,一股要求砂走公投寻求独立之路也愈见强烈。从砂到大马都不存在公投法案,“脱马”之举更被视为危险之举,但从寻求公投声音的发出,显示砂已有一群人对两方的处理手法都不满意,而筹划寻找第三条路。这种情况让我回想起在上届州选前,砂也出现“砂拉越人的砂拉越”情绪的酝酿和鼓吹。砂独是否存在可能性,暂且不谈,这股要求砂独的意识也并不可怕,它甚至可促使双方阵营省思和拟定对策,在为砂沙争取复权的努力上,该如何以诚意服众。
憲法第160(2)條文 - “the Federation” means the Federation established under the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1957; 請注意,第1(1)條文的 The Federation,是指1963年成立的馬來西亞。而第160(2)條文的 the Federation,詮釋的是根據1957年獨立的馬來亞聯合邦。根據第160(2)條文的詮釋,砂若接受這次2019年的憲法修正案,就是認同整個聯邦憲法裏面所提到的‘聯邦’是根據1957年的馬來亞聯合邦的定義來詮釋。1957年砂朥越和馬來亞之间是沒有任何關係的兩個國家。
(古晋11日讯)砂拉越人民联合党党员梁绍栋质疑修宪背后动机与目的是要砂拉越资源继续分享给马来亚。
他说,希盟如此急促修宪,打着复邦的假口号,却坚持使用1957年马来亚联邦契约,而不要1963年马来西亚契约,就是要用马来亚的宪法第160(2)条文“吃掉”砂拉越,包括石油主权和移民自主权不再属于砂拉越。
砂土保党 拿督依德利斯布昂声言,被拒绝的2019年修宪法案在措辞和实质方面缺乏必要的成分,以便赋予宪法的意义,即按照1963年马来西亚协议、政府级委员报告和科博委员会报告给予砂平等伙伴的地位。他指出,修宪法案中没有提及沙砂和马来亚是“平等伙伴”,而且也没有提及MA1963。另一个,是“联邦宪法”第160条对“联邦”的解释,现在仅仅是指“根据1957年马来亚联邦协定的联邦”,遗漏了砂、沙在1963年马来西亚协议下赋予的与马来亚的平等地位。他说,自1963年以来,“联邦”的解释出现了异常,这表明即使是1963年版本的第1(2)条也没有适当反映1963年马来西亚协议的精神。
肯雅兰全民党主席余清禄4月10日发布声明:
自4月4日希盟政府提呈憲法修正案一讀後,引起砂沙各界强烈反彈,特別是民衆擔心如此倉促的修憲會導致砂沙掉入另外一個陷進。希盟政府不預先公開修憲内容供民衆、黨團參考及討論,在一片反對聲浪中堅持在9日進行二讀。儘管修正案已經提出更改,但是修憲的配套並不符合砂政盟(GPS)所要求的條文160(2)也一起修正,導致法案闖關失敗。
(吉隆坡8日讯) 財政部今日提呈《2019年离境税法案》,並阐明任何离开大马的人士(不论国籍)都必须缴付离境税,牴触法令者將被罚款不超过50万令吉,或监禁不超过3年,或两者兼施。
Parti Bumi Kenyalang is a multi-racial political party in Sarawak and having an achievable mission :"IN QUEST OF INDEPENDENCE".
We plan to field 82 candidates in the coming Sarawak Election. We are not taking any donations but your gifts in appreciation of our struggles are appreciated.
肯雅兰全民党是砂拉越的多元种族政党,其使命是可实现的:“追求独立之路”。我们计划在即将到来的砂拉越大选中派出82名候选人,因此我们需要砂拉越人民和海外支持者在经济上以财礼(gift) 方式来支援我们。
![]() |
Download PBK Passport
(for reference only)
下载肯雅兰全民党:使命护照
(只共参考)