Shared Article:USUL REFERENDUM ORDINANCE DI DUN SARAWAK?
AMAT luar biasa itulah ayat yang mampu menggambarkan semangat kenyalang yang meresap di sidang mesyuarat Dewan Undangan Negeri Sarawak pada kali ini. Boleh dikatakan hampir setiap hari sidang mesyuarat begitu “panas” dengan perdebatan daripada para ADUN GPS dan juga PH. Selain membawa isu-isu mutakhir di kawasan masing-masing, para ADUN juga setakat ini memberikan pandangan masing-masing tentang apa yang berlaku sekarang.
肯雅兰全民党主席余清禄5月3日文告 ：
砂拉越政府必须坚持立法议会在前天4月30日所通过的有关修宪问题的砂拉越提案，坚决索回完整主权和邦国地位。
今天5月3日报章讯息，砂首长公署发出文告称，如若联邦国会不接受砂立法议会对国会修宪的提案，砂拉越政府也不会寻求公投，不会去投诉联合国。
BIG issue becomes No Issue
Same issue during BN Government era it was a BIG issue and now under PH government same old story is no longer an issue and challenge is dropped and issue forgotten.
砂拉越政府做对了
今天的砂拉越与1976年的砂拉越之间的区别，在于砂拉越人民现在已经觉醒。砂拉越今天更了解砂拉越在1963马来西亚契约(MA63)和跨政府组织(IGC)报告下应享有的权利，而不是56年前马来西亚成立时的权利。我们国家历史的此一关键部分，曾经并且持续不在校内教授。
口号都白喊了，选票都白投了！
对希望联盟的期望已经变成大失望。竞选宣言就以“竞选宣言不是圣经”把它不当一回事。是选民太好骗还是人民愚昧？海外大马影片导演也对大学以90:10 土著：非土著比例来接受学生而不是以成绩为标准，表示不满，
罗克强 Yb IR Lo Khere Chiang Debate in DUN Sarawak
Robert Lau Hui Yew gave a good summary to the debate in DUN Sarawak as follows:
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much more aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
DUN Sarawak Took The First Bold Step
To some, PH Sarawak debate in DUN was more of a face saving act owing to failed and questionable intention to amend Malaysia Federal Constitution with no real sign of regain equal partnership through the failed amendment attempt. Nevertheless, it is good to see all in DUN said "Yes" in one voice to the tabled motions/proposal. Such unity is essential for the betterment of Sarawak.
Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Patrick Anek Uren
Third of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan
First of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
文章分享 - 何俐萍.迁署与权限, 读后感
作者 ： 何俐萍 文章来源 ： 星洲日报 2019-04-27
读后感。不吐不快。不想憋在心里。砂沙高庭主簿署为什么一定要搬迁到沙巴。要搬迁连首长也蒙在鼓里。完全没把砂首长看在眼里。马来亚霸权还是那么横行霸道。 这一点是足够让90%的砂民愤怒。这是从无限不公平，不公正对待后，何俐萍（东马区副执行篇辑）对这事件谈公平，是否太离谱了？ 是否马来亚为中心，思维和倾向的心太重了? 那些行政署在马来亚也50多年了，为何不搬来砂国，以表示公平这水准。
Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - P. Waythamoorthy
The last of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented at the public forum on Malaysia Agreement held in Kuching on 27 April 2014 organized by SAPA and BHF.
“If MA63 is not law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?”
By Nancy Nais KUCHING, April 29:
Sarawak Association for Peoples’ Aspirations (Sapa) president Dominique Ng said if Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then it is not applicable nor binding on its components. Speaking at the ‘Should Sarawakians Support the Amendment to Federal Constitution Article 1(2) Bill as tabled on April 9, 2019, in light of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63)?’ forum yesterday, Ng said according to Malayan constitutional law expert Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi, the MA63 is not a law. “If Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a law, then what is Sarawak doing in Malaysia?” Ng asked.
Anak Sarawak spoke
The difference between the Sarawak of today and that of 1976 is that the people of Sarawak now has awaken.
Sarawak today is much nore aware of what are the rights due to Sarawak under the MA63 and the IGC Report than when Malaysia was formed 56 years ago. That critical part of our country's history was and continue not to be taught in our schools.
Anak Malaysia spoke out loud and clear.
Kuota hanya 10% kepada pelajar bukan Bumiputera di 15 pusat matrikulasi seluruh negara tidak adil kerana pusat itu ditanggung oleh wang pembayar cukai.
Record of history
Nancy Shukri fb:
Mungkin ada betul tuduhan saudara Vincent Wong ini. Saya merenung dan terfikir, apakah yang saya "tidak deliver" sebagaimana dituduh Saudara Vincent Wong. Mungkin, ada juga benda yang saya tidak lakukan atau tidak "deliver".
Legal Profession Bill 2019
An article by Voon Lee Shan,
former State Assemblyman for Batu Lintang and Legal Advisor for Parti Bumi Kenyalang
The words used by Dr Yii, MP for Bandar Kuching, "It is basically a proposal to get feedback from the Bar's members and it's associates" to me, seems to indicate that this is a job from the federal government.
PH Government = Tax Collector
PH government is no longer people friendly government but tax collectors?
It seems to be the case when their eyes only focus on how to squeeze an extra Ringgit out of Malaysian citizen.
kenyataan Daripada Yu Chin Liik Pengerusi Parti Bumi Kenyalang
Rakyat Sarawak telah mengalami sekali pertikaian dan telah mencapai persafahaman untuk memastikan kepentingan dan kebaikan Sarawak dipertahankan maka menyeru Kerajaan Sarawak ambil tindakan menggesa pihak professional seperti Persatuan peguam Sarawak, pertubuhan swasta dan pihak parti-parti politik di Sarawak sumbangkan cadangan mereka. Kami rakyat Sarawak menyeru dan menggesa Kerajaan Sarawak akan boleh bertindak:-
Can Mahathir run Malaysia’s economy without blaming Najib or ‘1MDB mess’?
“It won’t be a celebration, more of a reflection.”
That is how a senior member of Malaysia’s government described the televised speech Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad is expected to deliver on May 9, the first anniversary of the Pakatan Harapan coalition’s stunning election win.
肯雅兰全民党主席余清禄文告
据报章讯息 ，4月29日至5月9日召开的砂拉越立法议会，并无提呈任何关于修宪的法案！ 这对期盼砂立法议会能及时对下一步修宪如何走做出及时说明的砂拉越人民而言，的确是对此深感失望。
普遍砂拉越人民对近期联邦希盟政府为践行执政宣言里昭告天下要还回砂沙主权和平等邦国地位的承诺，而进行的国会第一轮修宪 失败感到惋惜。但也认为是一个好的开始。
Negara Sarawak, Negara Sabah
Video that correctly introducing Sabah and Sarawak as countries. Some young PH Sarawak leaders said "Sarawak a country" is a fairytale not knowing the history or only knowing the distorted history is a sad thing.
Will he repeat it in next Parliament session?
Before Rakyat put him in minister post he talked with no fear and with principle. Sadly after becoming minister he would not talk like this anymore. What is happening to him? He is a Sarawakian and yet he no longer dares to champion Sarawak's interest and rights. Disappointed by such drastic change of attitude and behavior. Is he still anak Sarawak?
聯合國大會第一五四一(十五)號決議（United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV)）
聯合國大會第一五四一(十五)號決議（United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV)）是联合国大会于1960年12月15日所通過的联合国会员国确定是否负有义务递送联合国宪章第七十三条（辰）款规定的情报所应遵循的原则。
Tun Fuad Stephen had this to say in 1962: ....automatically become a second class State or a Colony of Malaya.
The former Chief Minister of Sabah, Tun Fuad Stephen had this to say in 1962: My people feel that if North Borneo joins Malaya now as a State, it would infact meant that North Borneo would become not a State but a Colony of the Federation of Malaya. As I have said before, the fears are genuine. Not actually or suspicion of the sincerity to take on as equal partner but more the fear that by virtue of our status as a British Colony we would automatically become a second class State or a Colony of Malaya.
温利山：刘伟强拒绝 根据1963年马来西亚契约 6个字眼 的原因何在
温利山说﹕砂政府只要求在联邦宪法第1(2)条文修改上增加6个字眼﹐即“Pursuant to the Malaysia Agreement 1963”(根据1963年马来西亚契约)。但是﹐希盟政府却拒绝这么做。刘伟强说加入该6个字眼将使该条文更复杂。温利山﹕但是﹐希盟政府没有向公众解释它如何使该条文更复杂。希盟政府有义务向人民解释。新加坡于1965年在沙、砂不知情及允许的情况下退出。也许这就是联邦政府拒绝在联邦宪法第1(2)条文修改中加入该6个字眼的原因。
赖耀松：刘伟强是强词夺理 首相无先寻求砂首长同意 已是违宪
赖耀松 : 根据联邦宪法121项（4）条文阐明，决定沙巴和砂拉越高等法院主簿署的地点，要由最高元首御淮，惟必须事先是获得首相建议下批准。而后者（首相）也必须要咨询沙巴和砂拉越的首席部长的同意，以及高庭大法官（Chief Judge)的同意。从刘伟强今天发表的文告很明显，首相之前并没有向尤其是寻求砂拉越首席部长的同意。这已是违宪做法。身为律师更要比普通人更遵重法律和国家宪法，绝对不能把国家法律玩弄于股掌。
Malaysia Agreement 1963 Survey 马来西亚协议和修宪问题民意调查
Malaysia Agreement 1963 Survey
有关马来西亚协议和修宪的民意调查
Do you know the Malaysia Agreement 1963 in detail? * 您知道1963年马来西亚契约的详细内容吗？
Do you think the recent Federal Government actions is sincere to amend the Federal Constitution to restore equal partner status to Sabah & Sarawak? * ......
您认为最近联邦政府修宪举动是真心诚意要恢复砂、沙与马来亚半岛三邦之间平等伙伴地位吗？......
希盟联邦政府 “ 两重心 ”
看东铁我怀疑当局·有两重心:
1)落实东铁对中马经贸发展是正面的。
2)联邦政府可以随手抛出4百多亿去落实马来亚的工程计划,而砂的年发展拨款才40亿, 说好的10亿修残校以抵債方式落实, 财长林冠英却横刀 － 挡 -不准, 把小学生当政治筹码; 砂高速公路龟速的工程进展,搞的乱七八糟; 不少利民工程被希盟砍掉 ;摆明在处处勺难砂人民,剥夺砂人权益迫使砂人就范,悲哀。
向国际法院申诉沙巴和砂拉越人民的困境
国际法庭重审国际法规则~~~只有独立的主权国家才有权制定（国际）条约。作者是Joe Fernandez在2019年4月15日发表一篇具有影响力的文章。他是一个具有行政管理学荣誉学位，主修经济，也完成法律学位，现在在吉隆坡、沙巴和砂拉越教学英语。作者是一个长期关注婆罗洲、勤于研究马来亚的历史与法律。鉴于马来西亚从脱胎就是一个残缺不全的婴孩。修宪已经不能修补残缺不全的马来西亚计划，也帮不上沙巴和砂拉越走向自治独立之路。英国或者马来西亚联邦政府也不会出面协助。作者Joe Fernandez的文章强烈地提示沙、砂的人民需改变自己的思维，再不要固守在修改联邦宪法条文上兜圈子。应该走出去，走自己的路，寻求联合国的协助~~~向国际法院申诉沙巴和砂拉越人民寻求自治独立的困境。
Malaysia is Federation of Malaya?
Malaysia Agreement 1963 is supposed to sign Sabah, Singapore, Sarawak and federation of Malaya into a new country called Malaysia. Malaysian believe that is fact .
何俐萍：要求砂独的意识并不可怕，砂已有人寻找第三条路
目前，砂出现三股声音，除了支持和反对的声音，一股要求砂走公投寻求独立之路也愈见强烈。从砂到大马都不存在公投法案，“脱马”之举更被视为危险之举，但从寻求公投声音的发出，显示砂已有一群人对两方的处理手法都不满意，而筹划寻找第三条路。这种情况让我回想起在上届州选前，砂也出现“砂拉越人的砂拉越”情绪的酝酿和鼓吹。砂独是否存在可能性，暂且不谈，这股要求砂独的意识也并不可怕，它甚至可促使双方阵营省思和拟定对策，在为砂沙争取复权的努力上，该如何以诚意服众。
Offer A Gift To Support Parti Bumi Kenyalang (以财礼方式来支援肯雅兰全民党)
Parti Bumi Kenyalang is a multi-racial political party in Sarawak and having an achievable mission :"IN QUEST OF INDEPENDENCE".
We plan to field 82 candidates in the coming Sarawak Election. We are not taking any donations but your gifts in appreciation of our struggles are appreciated.
肯雅兰全民党是砂拉越的多元种族政党，其使命是可实现的：“追求独立之路”。我们计划在即将到来的砂拉越大选中派出82名候选人，因此我们需要砂拉越人民和海外支持者在经济上以财礼（gift) 方式来支援我们。
Parti Bumi Kenyalang Facebook "Live" 肯雅兰全民党面子书直播
PBK Mission Passport使命护照
|
|
 |
Download PBK Passport
(for reference only)
下载肯雅兰全民党：使命护照
(只共参考）
PBK Membership Application
Most Read 最多人阅读的文章排行版
- Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - P. Waythamoorthy
- 口琴合奏：“故乡变了样”
- 10 unlikeable things about Dr M
- Website Disclaimer
- 砂拉越人对联邦政府的失信有权表达他们失望和不满
- 砂拉越有权脱离马来西亚?
- 砂獨立後誰是國家領導 溫利山：不是我的事情
- 回应马来西亚首相在国会中所说的话
- 脱马提问引谩骂污蔑 刘强燕评击批评者心虚怕被戮破真相
- 砂擁自我決策權力 黃錦河：為何要被對付?
- 借刀杀人讨好敦马
- 何俐萍.砂拉越人还心系纳吉？
- 骂农民活该？！
- 让人哭笑不得
- 恳求砂拉越人民支持砂拉越独立探索中的肯雅兰全民党
- 政府钱太多？
- 谁疯了？
- 不称职的政治人物
- 羅斯里多比
- Truth Nothing But Truth?
Voice Of Kenyalang QR Code 肯雅兰之声二维码
Total Viewers Since 1 Dec 2018 从2018年12月1日至今总拜访人数
- 页面访问数：
- 4994952